Written by Laura Watson
Friday, 16 July 2010
Last Updated on Friday, 16 July 2010
Social Media
Today I saw an ad I really didn’t like. For your viewing pleasure – please see below.
This ad generated quite a stir here at digital Transfer and especially comments posted on twitter. After being posted on Mumbrella, there were several comments, which expressed a level of irritation – ‘wtf!’ commented “Sensis is really taking the bull by the horns by supporting and promoting the “serious issue” of endemic socklessness in Australia”, whilst ‘anon’ stated “This is exactly the sort of campaign that makes me feel ashamed to say I work in this industry…Disgusting.”
The fact that this campaign has to be ‘liked’ on Facebook in order for Sensis to donate a pair of socks was also contentious amongst the Mumbrella audience. From the get-go it appeared to be a seriously misguided use of social media and as I started to engage with the online conversation, it came to my attention that Sensis were, in my opinion, ill-equipped to respond to the public backlash using this platform.
A couple of tweets from me about this campaign yielded a response from an employee at Sensis. Initially, I was impressed; they were engaging in a conversation and taking steps to ease an overwhelmingly negative public response. “We absolutely get that this campaign is not 'social responsibility'. See Sensis GM Sustainability response on blog.” Clicking through to this
persons profile revealed that they had sent this same message to everyone who had mentioned the campaign on twitter. An auto-response? Really? Don’t wave the ‘conversation carrot’ in front of me and then bring it to my attention it’s really only a monologue. It wasn’t just me who was upset – others who had received the same response were starting to use some rather colourful language to express their anger and distaste towards Sensis.
I thought about biting my proverbial tongue but before I knew it I had told the people at Sensis they could call it whatever they wanted but they couldn’t polish a turd. It was cathartic.
At the end of the day, Sensis saw an opportunity to position themselves as an organisation with a moral conscience. Working with Mission Australia to create this campaign it’s clear they’re trying to make a difference (albeit a sock sized one), so it’s clear there was intent to deliver a level of assistance. Comments from Mission Australia also highlight that this campaign was in fact helpful for homeless people. Be that as it may, I still can’t come to terms with it; and this was further amplified through digital media. They fell short with the response team, which to my knowledge included a message from the CEO giving the campaign a massive wrap and an anonymous Sensis employee who had set up an account that day to field automated responses.
BE PREPARED. That’s the key out take from all of this. We all know the power of digital. We all know that people are sharing their opinions on and offline. So, when going to market, be prepared for a conversation. Hopefully it will be a positive one, but if it isn’t, be prepared to mitigate damage.